Hey {{first_name|default:there}}, it’s Vadim 👋
In case you missed our announcement last week, Bio Founder GPS now has a home!
Check it out at biofounder.io and share it with a friend. The more, the merrier🕺🏻
Last week, we broke down the anatomy of a pitch deck that actually works backwards from what investors really care about. Thank you to everyone for all of your responses, I’m so glad it was helpful!
But several of you wrote back with the same follow-up question:
"What about the one-pager? Do I need one if I already have a deck?"
The short answer: yes. And it might matter more than you may think.
Today, I'm going to cover exactly when to use a one-pager versus a deck, what goes on the page (section by section), and how to build one that earns the meeting, so that your deck can get the spotlight it deserves.
🧭 HERE’S WHAT WE’LL COVER TODAY:
Why you need a one-pager even if you already have a deck (and when to send which)
The One-Pager Anatomy: 7 sections that earn the meeting
A one-pager self-audit checklist you can use this weekend
Bonus resources
And more!
Let’s get into it.
FOUNDER STORY
A new page in Priya’s fundraise
A few months ago, a founder I advise, let's call her Priya, was stuck in a pattern that may sound familiar to a lot of you.
Priya is a brilliant scientist with a PhD in molecular biology, postdoc at a top-5 cancer center, and a first author on the paper that led to the company's core IP.
She understood her science better than anyone. And she'd poured that understanding into a 27-slide pitch deck - every mechanism explained, every data point contextualized, every competitive nuance accounted for.
The deck was her main calling card. She was sending it in cold emails, warm intros, LinkedIn messages, you name it.
The response, was frustratingly, mostly silence. Maybe a few polite meetings at RESI last year.
When we got on a call, Priya was frustrated, but not in the way you might expect.
She wasn't upset about the rejections. She was upset because she felt like investors weren't even seeing the science.
"They're not making it past slide 3," she told me.
"I can tell from the questions they ask… when they ask anything at all. They're not getting to the data that actually matters."
"What if you sent a one-pager instead?" I suggested.
She pushed back hard - and I get it.
For a technical founder, compressing years of research into a single page feels like a betrayal of the work.
Priya's exact words were: "If I cut the MOA section, they won't understand why our approach is different. If I cut the competitive landscape, they'll think we're just another me-too. I can't fit what makes us special on one page."
That fear is real, and it's one I hear constantly. There's this deeply held belief that if the investor doesn't see the full picture of the science, they'll miss what makes you special.
That less detail means less credibility. That simplifying equals dumbing down.
But here's what was actually happening: Priya was sending a nearly 30-slide deep dive to people who hadn't yet decided whether to spend 30 seconds on her company.
She was answering questions nobody had asked - yet, and in doing so, she was burying the signal in the noise.
We spent an afternoon rebuilding her story into a single page. She agonized over what to cut. She hated the first three versions.
But by version four, something clicked - the one-pager didn't dilute her story. It sharpened it.
She sent it to an investor the following Tuesday through a warm intro. By Thursday, she had a meeting on the calendar.
In the meeting, the investor told her: "Your one-pager was the clearest summary I've seen this quarter. Let’s dig into the details."
That's the misunderstanding that I see most often.
The one-pager isn't a lesser version of your deck. It's the document that earns the right to present it.
The science that Priya was so afraid of losing? It all came through in the meeting - because she actually got in the room.