
Hey there, it’s Vadim 👋
So, how bout those Knicks? 🎉🎉
Honestly, I still can’t believe it.
When not riding the emotional rollercoaster that’s been the Finals series, I've been heads-down building the slides for Tuesday's free workshop, and honestly, I'm pretty excited about how it's coming together!
If you haven't grabbed a seat yet, you can do that right here 👇
OK, on to today’s specials.
There’s a question I get very often, usually from founders that are just about to kick off a raise. It goes something like:
“I think the deck is finally done. Can you tell me if I'm missing anything?”
Now, you may say - that’s a perfectly reasonable question, right?
It turns out the truth is a bit more nuanced, and in a way that may be counterintuitive.
Today I’d like to walk through why that’s actually the wrong question to ask, and a framework that you can use in its place that may be a lot more productive.
It’s the same framework we’ll continue building on in Tuesday’s workshop, so think of today as a mental warmup, or a nutritional appetitizer 🙂
🧭 HERE’S WHAT WE’LL COVER:
The most expensive mistake you can make with your deck, and why it disguises itself as progress
The one reframe that quietly changes how you build every slide
The Three C’s Framework: the emotional arc every fundraise actually moves through
And more!
Let's dive in!
FOUNDER STORY

Auguste Rodin - The Thinker
From stone to story
A founder I've been working with sent me her deck a couple of weeks ago.
“I think it's FINALLY done. Can I hit Send?”
I opened it - 29 slides, with an appendix of just about the same length.
Every objection an investor could conceivably raise had been anticipated and answered somewhere in there, usually in several places, just for good measure.
The competitive landscape had its own three-slide arc. There was a slide for every reimbursement option, and a slide listing the team's publications going back the better part of a decade. There were at least 5 data slides, one after another, with all the experiment data that a 10 point font could accomodate.
By any reasonable measure, it was “complete.” She had covered everything.
This is a good thing, right?
Here is why, sadly, this was not going to work.
What she had built was a due diligence document - a careful, defensible record of the company. Yet, she was preparing to send it to investors she had never met.
Investors who, at that point, had no particular reason to care.
She hadn't earned the right to their attention yet, hadn't sparked any curiosity, hadn't given them a single reason to lean in.
The deck was busy answering questions nobody had thought to ask her, because nobody was interested enough yet to ask them.
When I brought this up, it uncovered a more uncomfortable problem. She didn't yet know who she would even be sending it to.
The same twenty-nine slides would land very differently with a family office - plenty wealthy, but with no scientific bench to speak of, than with a brand-name biotech fund whose team of PhDs would take her data apart line by line.
A single deck, built to satisfy all of them at once, would end up moving none of them.
What she had created, in the end, was a depository. An asset.
An asset is not a bad thing, by any means. It’s useful in its own way, but a little like a slab of good marble: solid and valuable, yet completely inert.
It was not yet the carved thing that makes a viewer stop and feel something, the thing that takes a person and carries them from one emotional state to the next.
And at this stage of her raise, that was the only job that really mattered.
This is the most expensive mistake I watch founders make, and the cruelest part is that it never feels like a mistake from the inside.
It feels like diligence. It feels, more than anything, like progress.
What she needed was something an asset could never be.
She needed an engine. A story.
Let's break this down so that you know how to get there 👇
FRAMEWORK #1
Asset or engine?
Every founder who has ever raised has felt the same gravitational pull.
A mentor gives you feedback, so you add a slide. An investor asks a question you didn't cover, so you add a slide.
Someone says your market section feels thin, so you add two more. Piece by piece, conversation by conversation, the deck grows into a careful ledger of every exchange you've ever had about your company.
And somewhere along the way, without anyone ever quite deciding it, the deck stops being a tool and becomes an archive.
This is what I've come to think of as the asset trap. You begin treating the deck as an asset, a document whose job is to stand as a complete and faithful record of everything the company is.
And the moment completeness becomes the goal, almost every instinct you have starts pointing in the wrong direction.
More detail starts to look like more rigor. More slides start to feel like more substance. Pre-answering every possible objection starts to feel like the responsible thing to do.
The trouble is that the investor on the other side was never trying to audit your company - not yet, anyway.
They opened your deck with a far simpler and far more human question in mind - is this company worth my time, and am I curious to learn more about what this company represents, and the founders behind it?
So here is the reframe I'd offer you: don’t ask what your deck contains, ask first what it’s supposed to do.
What is the job to be done - at that particular point in time, with that particular investor?
A deck built as an asset is optimized for completeness. A deck built as an engine is optimized for motion.
It exists to carry the person reading it forward by one deliberate step, and to earn the single thing a deck can really win you, which is the next conversation.
And once you start seeing the deck as an engine, the purpose of the whole exercise comes into focus in a way it rarely does when you're heads-down adding slides.
Because, contrary to popular belief, the deck's job is never really to raise money. The money is a byproduct.
The job of the deck is to build enough belief, and enough trust, that an investor wants to take the next step, and the steps that follow.
But where do the steps lead?
You can think of a fundraise as a funnel.
Your deck lands in an inbox, gets read by some combination of an AI screen and a human, earns a first call, and from there moves toward diligence, a partner meeting, and, if everything holds - a term sheet.
At nearly every step, the great majority fall away. By some estimates, nine in ten decks that make it past the screen never even convert into a first meeting.
So, taking those odds into account, at those few stages, the deck has precisely ONE job: earn the call. Earn the interest.
Which is why the founder who builds a single heroic deck to carry the entire journey is set up to struggle.
The deck you send through cold outreach has a different job from the one you talk through on a first Zoom, and both differ again from the deck that sits in your data room waiting to be picked apart in diligence.
Each stage asks something different of you, and the decks that work are the ones built for the job directly in front of them (we'll cover this in more detail on Tuesday).
FRAMEWORK #2

The Three C's
If the funnel is the map, then the 3 C's are the emotional states you're moving an investor through as you travel it.
At each stage, the deck's real job is to act as a catalyst, sparking just enough of the right reaction to carry an investor into the next phase, and no further.
Curiosity first, then conversation, then conviction. You can think of the classic 3 C’s model, but adapted to fundraising.
Here's how they break down:
Curiosity
This is the only job of your send-ahead deck. An investor reads it with no narrator, no context, and roughly the attention they'd give a stranger's email, which is to say very little. The deck doesn't have to answer everything at this stage. It has to make them curious enough to give you their most precious resource - their time.
Conversation
Now you're on that call, and the job changes. The deck slips into a supporting role while you do the real work of turning a one-way read into a genuine conversation and building of the relationship. The whole purpose of this stage is to earn the deep dive that comes after it.
Conviction
This is where ultimately the deal gets decided. By now the investor has read, talked, and dug in, and the only question left is whether all of it adds up to the kind of belief that ends in a check.
Remember: You won't close your raise in twelve slides. But you just might close it if those twelve slides earn you the next thirty minutes, and allow you to build a genuine relationship with your investors.
CHECKLIST
Before you send another deck
A quick audit to run on your own deck this weekend, while the funnel's still fresh in your mind.
Name the stage first: before you send anything, be honest about whether this is your cold-outreach deck, your first-call deck, or your data-room deck - they're three genuinely different jobs, and you'll want a different deck for each.
Write the one job at the top: what does this deck actually need to earn next - the call, the deep dive, or the term sheet? It sounds almost too simple, but if you can't say it in a sentence, the deck won't be able to answer it for you.
Know who's on the other side: a family office that's wealthy but not technical will read your story very differently than a fund with a bench of PhDs who go straight for your data - so build for the reader in front of you, rather than the average of everyone.
Aim for the very next step, and nothing past it: ask whether you're inviting the reader into the next conversation, or quietly asking them to decide the whole thing on the spot - because if it's the latter, you've reached too far down the funnel, and they can usually feel it.
Embrace your unique POV: somewhere in there should be a non-obvious truth you earned by living the science, running your experiments, understanding the customer pain points… and that, far more than any slide design hack, is what builds true belief and conviction.
THAT’S A WRAP!
If you've been building one heroic deck to carry your entire raise, consider this your intervention :)
What you're really after is a deck that knows which single job it's doing at each stage, and does that one job well enough to earn the next conversation.
Get the job right, stage by stage, and the funnel slowly starts working for you instead of against you.
But everything we covered today is really just the tip of the iceberg.
On Tuesday, we zoom out to see the big picture.
🎉 FREE WORKSHOP 🎉
Here’s a sneak peak into what I’ve been working on.
On Tuesday, in Build a Pitch Deck That Beats the AI Screen and Wins the Room, we'll work through the five things I think matter most for a deck in 2026:
What a pitch deck is really for - we build on today’s themes, with tactical tips on what they mean for your fundraise.
How investors actually evaluate your deck - the AI screen, the VC memo, and how you can work backwards from them to increase your odds of success.
Pitch deck structures working in 2026 - what's landing across therapeutics, med device, techbio, diagnostics, and SaaS.
Designing in the age of AI - best practices and watch-outs so you don’t come across like a 🤖
How to match the deck to the check - the five investor types, and how to adapt your deck (and your story) for whoever's in the room.
🗓️ Tuesday, June 16 - 12pm ET - live on Zoom.
Everyone who attends live will also get a copy of the slides, two AI tools to pressure-test your own deck, and a few other resources to take with you. And if you can't make it live, register anyway, since everyone who signs up gets the recording.
See you on Tuesday!!
Vadim
PS: When you’re ready, here’s how I can help:
Pitch Deck Audit: Want personalized feedback on how your deck lines up against both the AI screen and the VC reading behind it? I'll do an in-depth, slide by slide review of how your materials read to a machine, to a human, and how to tighten both. You'll also get a curated investor list matched to your stage, modality, and milestones.
Apply to work with me: If you're a life-sciences founder and need help with fundraising, BD, or building your executive presence online, fill out this brief form and I'll be in touch.